Early Career Seminar of the International Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ISECS) Trier (Germany), 17-20 June 2026 

Organizers: Damien Tricoire (Universität Trier), J.B. Shank (University of Minnesota),  Alexander Bevilacqua (Williams College), Joan-Pau Rubiés (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) 

Eighteenth-century studies were long based implicitly or explicitly on the premise that contacts  between European, African, and Asian cultures had no significant intellectual and cultural  impact before the modern Age of Imperialism. In the historiography of the European  Enlightenment, the interaction with non-European thought in the course of early-modern  European colonial expansion has long had a place, but was above all understood – as in the  “shock of discovery” thesis – as the trigger of a process that undermined European certainties.  In the second half of the twentieth century, scholars emphasized othering processes rather than  circulations, receptions, and translations. In recent decades, however, scholarship has gained a  much better understanding of the profound impact that contacts across religious borders had on  thought and culture before modern European imperialism in Afro-Eurasia. Three scholarly  developments have been particularly significant: first, placing eighteenth-century phenomena  in the longue durée of Christian erudition has shown the roots in knowledge-making of many  reorientations once associated with secularization. Second, emphasizing the mobility of people  and objects, in particular manuscript books, has revealed the groundedness of new perceptions  in material circulations. Third, taking seriously as intellectuals all participants in global  interactions has revealed a world not divided between thinkers and their informants or intermediaries but rather one in which knowledge was co-produced cross-culturally by a variety  of agents.  

The Early Career Seminar aims to contribute to this renewal by understanding cultural  and intellectual change as a response to the increasing connectivities in the early modern world.  For the purposes of the seminar, we will restrict our focus to interactions between what we are  calling “transcendentalist worldviews,” namely the universalist religious and/or ethical systems  that prevailed in large parts of Afro-Eurasia since antiquity. The centuries-long dominance of  universalist ethical systems from Japan to Portugal and West Africa suggests an intensive  dialogue along the many roads linking world regions in the pre-modern era. In recent  scholarship, a special emphasis has been placed on the circulation of millenarianism in early modern Eurasia, yet addressing circulations is as relevant for many kinds of religious and  ethical reform movements, like moral rigorism, mysticism or the quest for a more rational  religion and a society based on natural principles. Adopting a broad view on religious and  ethical change across Afro-Eurasia may help to provincialize Europe by putting ideas popular  from Portugal to Russia into a wider geographical and chronological context. 

We would therefore like to ask the following questions in this workshop-style seminar: – How did in-depth engagement with foreign universalist religious-ethical thought and  symbolic languages arise in the early modern era, and especially in the eighteenth  century? And how did it shape cultural and intellectual developments in various parts  of eighteenth-century Afro-Eurasia?  

– What were the conditions for the creative appropriation of foreign religious-ethical  thoughts and symbols across Afro-Eurasia? What circulations–of people, texts, objects,  symbols or images–brought these appropriations into being? What conceptual tools–for  example, comparisons, analogies, translations–played a part in mediating between  traditions? What role did the similarities between religious-ethical systems or shared  pre-modern traditions play in circulations? What transfers can we identify both across  space and time? What ideas, cultural artifacts and symbols did not circulate and why? 

– To what extent did similar developments in thought and culture arise in different regions  of eighteenth-century Afro-Eurasia? Do we see equivalent trends in political or moral  reformism, or similar notions of the comparability of cultures and religions? Is it fruitful  to speak of Eurasian Enlightenments? 

Proposals (one page) should be sent with a CV to the following address by 1st July 2025:  tricoire@uni-trier.de. 

We endeavor to cover travel and accommodation costs in their entirety and for all participants,  but cannot guarantee it at this point.